Remedies for a breached contract can end up being confusing. Breaching of contracts means that one of the parties has failed to perform a “material” part of the contract.
If it is a significant, primary, or important aspect of the contract then it is considered “material.” Frequently, the solution for a material breach is that the non-breaching party is normally both excused from their own further performance under the contract, and it also entitles them to seek from the breaching party a court-ordered award of monetary damages that result from the breach.
The non-breaching party has to prove that their damages with reasonable certainty and prove a causal link between the breach of contract and the damages suffered.
This can include direct damages that instantly stem from the breach as well as the possibility for indirect “special damages,” this is then broken into “consequential” and “incidental” damages. Consequential damages are considered indirect losses to the party that flows from the breach, such as damages to a person, damage to other properties, lost customers, lost use, or lost profits.
Consequential damages must be a generally known or fairly foreseeable result of a breached
contract, if an item of claimed consequential damages is very far fetched, it will most likely not be awarded. In the instance of a “non-material” breach, the party who has breached the contract may be responsible for damages.
The concept in which the non-breaching party essentially requests to undo and terminate the contract as if it never was to exist is called rescission. A party that wishes to rescind a contract to have proof that the breach was material.
Once that is provided and the rescission is requested, the court then attempts to place both parties back in the position that they were in prior to the contract being created. The rescinding party can’t seek any additional monetary damages that was suffered as a result of the breaching.
To get additional monetary damages, the non-breaching party must declare the existence of the contract, leave the parties responsibilities and rights as they are standing, and look to add up the additional damages suffered monetarily.
It is often wondered if a non-breaching party can force the breaching party to appropriately perform whatever remains due under the contract terms. This is sometimes called “curing the default” or normally “specific performance,” and regularly this is denied because a court will not make a breaching party finish its performance.
However, both parties can agree to finish their performances to remedy a dispute but a court will not normally force the parties to do this. The court's solution is to award damages
monetarily.
A common issue that can occur is for the non-breaching party to “mitigate” its damages, or make an effort responsibly to lower the accumulation of any damages caused if possible. An example of this is a landlord's duty to attempt to find a new renter in place of the existing renter that has breached the lease and moves out of their unit early.
If the landlord is unable or just does not make an effort, a court can deny some of the lost rent damages that the landlord endured due to their own failure to alleviate their damages.
The issue of a breached contract and its solutions that are in place in favor of the non-breaching party varies and can be complicated. It is best to speak with an attorney to help you find what solution is best for you if any contracts are ever breached.
If you need any help regarding litigation or other legal matters please reach out to us directly here and schedule a call with one of our paralegals on our scheduling page here.
If you need help with estate planning or any other legal concerns, we are here for you. Don't hesitate to contact our firm directly for assistance. Our dedicated team is ready to provide support and guidance to you and your loved ones during important life transitions.
Whether you're ready to schedule a strategy session to discuss your specific needs or if you're interested in exploring our wide range of complimentary guides and additional resources, we encourage you to get in touch with us.
With licensed attorneys and offices located in both Illinois and Missouri, we are well-equipped to serve clients in these regions. Reach out to us today and let us leverage our expertise and care to guide you through the legal process.
Begin your journey by taking advantage of our collection of complimentary guides.
Simple & Convenient, Cost Effective, Attorney Reviewed Documents.
Click the button & fill out the form so we can better understand how we can help.
Sivia Business & Legal Services, P.C. goes beyond the scope of a traditional legal firm. We offer personalized solutions for you, your family and your business. We want to understand your plans for the future.
Edwardsville
217 South Main Street Edwardsville, IL 62025
618.659.4499
East Alton
1 Terminal Dr, East Alton, IL 62024
618.258.4800
Swansea
7a Park Place Swansea, IL 62226
618.239.4430
Wentzville
511 W. Pearce Blvd. Wentzville, MO 63385
636.332.5555
Creve Coeur
12747 Olive Blvd., #300, St. Louis, MO
636.332.5555
Mt. Vernon
1115 Harrison St. Mt. Vernon, IL 62864
618.242.0200
Edwardsville
217 South Main Street, Edwardsville, IL 62025
618.659.4499
East Alton
1 Terminal Dr. East Alton, IL 62024
618.258.4800
Wentzville
511 W. Pearce Blvd. Wentzville, MO 63385
636.332.5555
Swansea
7a Park Place Swansea, IL 62226
618.239.4430
Chesterfield
13321 N. Outer 40 Road, Ste. 700, Chesterfield, MO
636.332.5555
Creve Coeur
12747 Olive Blvd., #300, St. Louis, MO
636.332.5555
Mt. Vernon
1115 Harrison St, Mt. Vernon IL
618.242.0200
All Rights Reserved | Powered By AutomationLinks | Privacy Policy | Terms and Conditions